Dr Rand just put out a new video on FB with ideal trough levels

Stoak

Active Member
Dr Rand just put out a new video on FB with ideal trough levels. He claims that we have known since the 50s that test levels using exogenous testosterone are not the same as those with endogenous production. He said the IDEAL tough level on a once weekly injection is total T 800ng/dl and free T of 29-32. These are the minimum levels to be maintained. He also said, he isn't going to argue with you if you feel great at 16 free T.

When I began TRT these were the numbers and now the lab tests have 20 being too high for free t. I have always shot for free t of 30 and have felt best there. Something to think about.
 
Dr Rand just put out a new video on FB with ideal trough levels. He claims that we have known since the 50s that test levels using exogenous testosterone are not the same as those with endogenous production. He said the IDEAL tough level on a once weekly injection is total T 800ng/dl and free T of 29-32. These are the minimum levels to be maintained. He also said, he isn't going to argue with you if you feel great at 16 free T.

When I began TRT these were the numbers and now the lab tests have 20 being too high for free t. I have always shot for free t of 30 and have felt best there. Something to think about.

Ideal, minimum levels to be maintained LMFAO!

What that ridiculous once weekly whopping dosed 200 mg T protocol with an AI throw in to boot LOL!

Cookie cutter!

Go push that nonsense on one of those kiddie forums.

I could name off numerous top experts in the field that would s**t all over this!

If you are hitting a very high trough FT 30+ng/dL 7 f**king days post-injection you are clearly overmedicated plain and simple.

If you are going to aim for a higher-end trough the easy fix here would be injecting daily or EOD not twice-weekly let alone once weekly.

He is out to lunch like the rest of those that reside in that more T is better mentality camp.

As I have stated numerous times on the forum over the years.

Too many caught up on that more T is better mentality bulls**t being pushed by most of those T-mills, so called gurus and half wits stinking up all the so called HRT/mens health forums.

Always need to be mindful of your injection frequency/where trough FT sits.

FT <5 ng/dL would be considerd low.

FT 5-9 ng/dL would be considered the grey zone where some men may experience symptoms of low-T.

FT 10-15 ng/dL would be healthy.

FT 20-25 ng/dL would be high-end/high!

The majority of men will do well with a trough FT 15-25 ng/dL depending on the injection frequency.

Need to keep in mind that there is a big difference between one running a high-end/high trough FT 20-25 ng/dL injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly.

Also going to be a big difference in peak--->trough on said protocol.

Many tend to overlook this and gun for a high-end/high trough FT only to end up struggling with sides especilly in the long run.

Just to put this in perspective most healthy young males would be hitting a cFTV 13-15 ng/dL or 10-12 ng/dL tested using the most accurate assay the gold standard Equilibrium Dialysis and this is a short-lived daily peak to boot.

Even if you take those natty outliers in the 97.5th percentile hitting a high FT 25.3 ng/dL again this is a short-lived daily peak to boot.

You have guys on T hitting a trough FT 25-30+ ng/dL injecting daily with FT elevated 24/7, EOD as in every 2 days (48 hrs post-injection),twice-weekly as in every 3.5 days (84 hrs post-injection), once weekly as in 7 days post-injection.

This is a common theme when it comes to the FT s**t show!

Too many are overmedicated on T off the hop let alone on therapy.

Many lack the understanding of how exogenous T works.

Start low and go slow we say, titrate slowly if need be.

The majority of low-T symptoms will be relieved/improved hitting a healthy trough FT as in 15-25 ng/dL or the upper 1/3rd.

T is a threshold hormone!

Main point here being start low and go slow titrate the dose if need be until the threshold is crossed (bloodwork + symptoms).

Symptoms improved while at the same time minimizing/avoiding sides, keeping blood markers healthy and maintaining long-term health is key here!

Crossing the threshold turns the lights on but cranking the dimmer switch past that doesn't make them shine brighter. It's a ceiling effect, not a linear dose-response.

Especially when it comes to libido and erectile function.

Last thing you want to be doing here is hammering the s**t out of your CNS and dopamine!

Again the majority of symptoms will be improved once you achieve a healthy FT which for most would be aiming for a healthy/high-end trough 15-25 ng/dL.




Where do those natty outliers that fall in the 97.5th percentile sit?

This is a F**KING short-lived daily peak to boot!

LMFAO!


*We established mFT reference ranges for healthy men aged 18 to 69 years




We present 95% mFT age-stratified reference ranges


Age category (years)

Median mFT (ng/dl)

95% mFT reference range (ng/dl)

18-29 (n=140)
30-39 (n=252)

12.0
9.8

6.7-25.3
4.9-18.5

40-49 (n=207)

8.1

4.3.14.2

50-59 (n=146)

7.1

3.8-12.8

60-69 (n=126)

6.4

3.4-11.7

70-79 (n=125)

5.6

2.7-8.7

*The gold-standard for the determination of FT levels is considered to be directly measured free testosterone (mFT) using equilibrium dialysis followed by mass spectrometry (ED LC-MS/MS). However, no widely accepted reference ranges are available for this clinical parameter. We established mFT reference ranges for healthy men aged 18 to 69 years




*Serum samples were analyzed from healthy men participating in the SIBLOS/SIBEX and EMAS studies, both population-based cohort studies



* mFT levels were measured in 867 men using ED LC-MS/MS as previously reported (1).


Reference:
1. Fiers T, Wu F, Moghetti P, Vanderschueren D, Lapauw B, Kaufman JM. Reassessing Free-Testosterone Calculation by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Direct Equilibrium Dialysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(6). doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02360

In the current study, we used a state-of-the-art direct ED method to reassess FT in sets of representative serum samples. This method takes advantage of the ability of a highly sensitive and accurate measurement of T by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to reliably measure the low FT concentration directly in the dialysate after ED. This more straightforward method avoids potential sources of inaccuracy in indirect ED, such as those resulting from tracer impurities or from measures to limit their impact (e.g., sample dilution). We then used the measured FT results to re-evaluate some characteristics of two more established and a more recently proposed calculations for estimation of FT.











My reply from a previous thread!

I can name off numerous top experts in the field that have been treating 1000s of men over decades with VAST clinical experience and YEARS of RESEARCH in the field.

Throw my doctor in there too who has 20+ years under his belt and would be considered one of the top uros in Canada specializing in testosterone therapy!

They would eat this up quick!

Abe hitting the nail on the head here!


Abraham Morgentaler

* what's important to understand though is that the concept of testosterone therapy in theory is designed to replicate youthful levels of testosterone to help people who are deficient in this hormone, the goal isn't to make them into supermen and the real question is why do people want to go above normal if at all, much of the concept of treating up lets say a 1000 let's say our normal upper limit, in the anti-aging community or age management community there are some people who believe the there's an optimal level of testosterone that may be 1200 or 1500 or even I've heard 1800 and the basis for that is WEAK!



You know the man who would be considered the father of testosterone and has made huge contributions in the field of testosterone therapy and men's health let alone has treated 1000s of men over decades!

Would be considered one of the top heavyweights when it comes to (research/clinical experience) in the field of hormone replacement therapy!


 
Ideal, minimum levels to be maintained LMFAO!

What that ridiculous once weekly whopping dosed 200 mg T protocol with an AI throw in to boot LOL!

Go push that nonsense on one of those kiddie forums.

I could name off numerous top experts in the field that would s**t all over this!

If you are hitting a very high trough FT 30+ng/dL 7 f**king days post-injection you are clearly overmedicated plain and simple.

If you are going to aim for a higher-end trough the easy fix here would be injecting daily or EOD not twice-weekly let alone once weekly.

He is out to lunch like the rest of those that reside in that more T is better mentality camp.

As I have stated numerous times on the forum over the years.

Too many caught up on that more T is better mentality bulls**t being pushed by most of those T-mills, so called gurus and half wits stinking up all this so called HRT/mens health forums.

Always need to be mindful of your injection frequency/where trough FT sits.

FT <5 ng/dL would be considerd low.

FT 5-9 ng/dL would be considered the grey zone where some men may experience symptoms of low-T.

FT 10-15 ng/dL would be healthy.

FT 20-25 ng/dL would be high-end/high!

The majority of men will do well with a trough FT 15-25 ng/dL depending on the injection frequency.

Need to keep in mind that there is a big difference between one running a high-end/high trough FT 20-25 ng/dL injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly.

Also going to be a big difference in peak--->trough on said protocol.

Many tend to overlook this and gun for a high-end/high trough FT only to end up struggling with sides especilly in the long run.

Just to put this in perspective most healthy young males would be hitting a cFTV 13-15 ng/dL or 10-12 ng/dL tested using the most accurate assay the gold standard Equilibrium Dialysis and this is a short-lived daily peak to boot.

Even if you take those natty outliers in the 95th percentile hitting a high FT 25 ng/dL again this is a short-lived daily peak to boot.

You have guys on T hitting a trough FT 25-30+ ng/dL injecting daily with FT elevated 24/7, EOD as in every 2 days (48 hrs post-injection),twice-weekly as in every 3.5 days (84 hrs post-injection), once weekly as in 7 days post-injection.

This is a common theme when it comes to the FT s**t show!

Too many are overmedicated on T off the hop let alone on therapy.

Many lack the understanding of how exogenous T works.

Start low and go slow we say, titrate slowly if need be.

The majority of low-T symptoms will be relieved/improved hitting a healthy trough FT as in 15-25 ng/dL or the upper 1/3rd.

T is a threshold hormone!

Main point here being start low and go slow titrate the dose if need be until the threshold is crossed (bloodwork + symptoms).

Symptoms improved while at the same time minimizing/avoiding sides, keeping blood markers healthy and maintaining long-term health is key here!

Crossing the threshold turns the lights on but cranking the dimmer switch past that doesn't make them shine brighter. It's a ceiling effect, not a linear dose-response.

Especially when it comes to libido and erectile function.

Last thing you want to be doing here is hammering the s**t out of your CNS and dopamine!

Again the majority of symptoms will be improved once you achieve a healthy FT which for most would be aiming for a healthy/high-end trough 15-25 ng/dL.




Where do those natty outliers that fall in the 95th percentile sit?

This is a F**KING short-lived daily peak to boot!

LMFAO!


*We established mFT reference ranges for healthy men aged 18 to 69 years




We present 95% mFT age-stratified reference ranges


Age category (years)

Median mFT (ng/dl)

95% mFT reference range (ng/dl)

18-29 (n=140)
30-39 (n=252)

12.0
9.8

6.7-25.3
4.9-18.5

40-49 (n=207)

8.1

4.3.14.2

50-59 (n=146)

7.1

3.8-12.8

60-69 (n=126)

6.4

3.4-11.7

70-79 (n=125)

5.6

2.7-8.7

*The gold-standard for the determination of FT levels is considered to be directly measured free testosterone (mFT) using equilibrium dialysis followed by mass spectrometry (ED LC-MS/MS). However, no widely accepted reference ranges are available for this clinical parameter. We established mFT reference ranges for healthy men aged 18 to 69 years




*Serum samples were analyzed from healthy men participating in the SIBLOS/SIBEX and EMAS studies, both population-based cohort studies



* mFT levels were measured in 867 men using ED LC-MS/MS as previously reported (1).


Reference:
1. Fiers T, Wu F, Moghetti P, Vanderschueren D, Lapauw B, Kaufman JM. Reassessing Free-Testosterone Calculation by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Direct Equilibrium Dialysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(6). doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02360

In the current study, we used a state-of-the-art direct ED method to reassess FT in sets of representative serum samples. This method takes advantage of the ability of a highly sensitive and accurate measurement of T by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to reliably measure the low FT concentration directly in the dialysate after ED. This more straightforward method avoids potential sources of inaccuracy in indirect ED, such as those resulting from tracer impurities or from measures to limit their impact (e.g., sample dilution). We then used the measured FT results to re-evaluate some characteristics of two more established and a more recently proposed calculations for estimation of FT.











My reply from a previous thread!

I can name off numerous top experts in the field that have been treating 1000s of men over decades with VAST clinical experience and YEARS of RESEARCH in the field.

Throw my doctor in there too who has 20+ years under his belt and would be considered one of the top uros in Canada specializing in testosterone therapy!

They would eat this up quick!

Abe hitting the nail on the head here!


Abraham Morgentaler

* what's important to understand though is that the concept of testosterone therapy in theory is designed to replicate youthful levels of testosterone to help people who are deficient in this hormone, the goal isn't to make them into supermen and the real question is why do people want to go above normal if at all, much of the concept of treating up lets say a 1000 let's say our normal upper limit, in the anti-aging community or age management community there are some people who believe the there's an optimal level of testosterone that may be 1200 or 1500 or even I've heard 1800 and the basis for that is WEAK!



You know the man who would be considered the father of testosterone and has made huge contributions in the field of testosterone therapy and men's health let alone has treated 1000s of men over decades!

Would be considered one of the top heavyweights when it comes to (research/clinical experience) in the field of hormone replacement therapy!



Ideal, minimum levels to be maintained LMFAO!

What that ridiculous once weekly whopping dosed 200 mg T protocol with an AI throw in to boot LOL!

Go push that nonsense on one of those kiddie forums.

I could name off numerous top experts in the field that would s**t all over this!

If you are hitting a very high trough FT 30+ng/dL 7 f**king days post-injection you are clearly overmedicated plain and simple.

If you are going to aim for a higher-end trough the easy fix here would be injecting daily or EOD not twice-weekly let alone once weekly.

He is out to lunch like the rest of those that reside in that more T is better mentality camp.

As I have stated numerous times on the forum over the years.

Too many caught up on that more T is better mentality bulls**t being pushed by most of those T-mills, so called gurus and half wits stinking up all this so called HRT/mens health forums.

Always need to be mindful of your injection frequency/where trough FT sits.

FT <5 ng/dL would be considerd low.

FT 5-9 ng/dL would be considered the grey zone where some men may experience symptoms of low-T.

FT 10-15 ng/dL would be healthy.

FT 20-25 ng/dL would be high-end/high!

The majority of men will do well with a trough FT 15-25 ng/dL depending on the injection frequency.

Need to keep in mind that there is a big difference between one running a high-end/high trough FT 20-25 ng/dL injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly.

Also going to be a big difference in peak--->trough on said protocol.

Many tend to overlook this and gun for a high-end/high trough FT only to end up struggling with sides especilly in the long run.

Just to put this in perspective most healthy young males would be hitting a cFTV 13-15 ng/dL or 10-12 ng/dL tested using the most accurate assay the gold standard Equilibrium Dialysis and this is a short-lived daily peak to boot.

Even if you take those natty outliers in the 95th percentile hitting a high FT 25 ng/dL again this is a short-lived daily peak to boot.

You have guys on T hitting a trough FT 25-30+ ng/dL injecting daily with FT elevated 24/7, EOD as in every 2 days (48 hrs post-injection),twice-weekly as in every 3.5 days (84 hrs post-injection), once weekly as in 7 days post-injection.

This is a common theme when it comes to the FT s**t show!

Too many are overmedicated on T off the hop let alone on therapy.

Many lack the understanding of how exogenous T works.

Start low and go slow we say, titrate slowly if need be.

The majority of low-T symptoms will be relieved/improved hitting a healthy trough FT as in 15-25 ng/dL or the upper 1/3rd.

T is a threshold hormone!

Main point here being start low and go slow titrate the dose if need be until the threshold is crossed (bloodwork + symptoms).

Symptoms improved while at the same time minimizing/avoiding sides, keeping blood markers healthy and maintaining long-term health is key here!

Crossing the threshold turns the lights on but cranking the dimmer switch past that doesn't make them shine brighter. It's a ceiling effect, not a linear dose-response.

Especially when it comes to libido and erectile function.

Last thing you want to be doing here is hammering the s**t out of your CNS and dopamine!

Again the majority of symptoms will be improved once you achieve a healthy FT which for most would be aiming for a healthy/high-end trough 15-25 ng/dL.




Where do those natty outliers that fall in the 95th percentile sit?

This is a F**KING short-lived daily peak to boot!

LMFAO!


*We established mFT reference ranges for healthy men aged 18 to 69 years




We present 95% mFT age-stratified reference ranges


Age category (years)

Median mFT (ng/dl)

95% mFT reference range (ng/dl)

18-29 (n=140)
30-39 (n=252)

12.0
9.8

6.7-25.3
4.9-18.5

40-49 (n=207)

8.1

4.3.14.2

50-59 (n=146)

7.1

3.8-12.8

60-69 (n=126)

6.4

3.4-11.7

70-79 (n=125)

5.6

2.7-8.7

*The gold-standard for the determination of FT levels is considered to be directly measured free testosterone (mFT) using equilibrium dialysis followed by mass spectrometry (ED LC-MS/MS). However, no widely accepted reference ranges are available for this clinical parameter. We established mFT reference ranges for healthy men aged 18 to 69 years




*Serum samples were analyzed from healthy men participating in the SIBLOS/SIBEX and EMAS studies, both population-based cohort studies



* mFT levels were measured in 867 men using ED LC-MS/MS as previously reported (1).


Reference:
1. Fiers T, Wu F, Moghetti P, Vanderschueren D, Lapauw B, Kaufman JM. Reassessing Free-Testosterone Calculation by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Direct Equilibrium Dialysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(6). doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02360

In the current study, we used a state-of-the-art direct ED method to reassess FT in sets of representative serum samples. This method takes advantage of the ability of a highly sensitive and accurate measurement of T by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to reliably measure the low FT concentration directly in the dialysate after ED. This more straightforward method avoids potential sources of inaccuracy in indirect ED, such as those resulting from tracer impurities or from measures to limit their impact (e.g., sample dilution). We then used the measured FT results to re-evaluate some characteristics of two more established and a more recently proposed calculations for estimation of FT.











My reply from a previous thread!

I can name off numerous top experts in the field that have been treating 1000s of men over decades with VAST clinical experience and YEARS of RESEARCH in the field.

Throw my doctor in there too who has 20+ years under his belt and would be considered one of the top uros in Canada specializing in testosterone therapy!

They would eat this up quick!

Abe hitting the nail on the head here!


Abraham Morgentaler

* what's important to understand though is that the concept of testosterone therapy in theory is designed to replicate youthful levels of testosterone to help people who are deficient in this hormone, the goal isn't to make them into supermen and the real question is why do people want to go above normal if at all, much of the concept of treating up lets say a 1000 let's say our normal upper limit, in the anti-aging community or age management community there are some people who believe the there's an optimal level of testosterone that may be 1200 or 1500 or even I've heard 1800 and the basis for that is WEAK!



You know the man who would be considered the father of testosterone and has made huge contributions in the field of testosterone therapy and men's health let alone has treated 1000s of men over decades!

Would be considered one of the top heavyweights when it comes to (research/clinical experience) in the field of hormone replacement therapy!


Dr Rand McClain was invited to this forum to answer questions before. He is highly respected. His entire point was that endogenous reference ranges are for just that. Endogenous production. You can call it kiddie or whatever you like. His expertise is no less valid that the experts you are claiming.
 
Dr Rand McClain was invited to this forum to answer questions before. He is highly respected. His entire point was that endogenous reference ranges are for just that. Endogenous production. You can call it kiddie or whatever you like. His expertise is no less valid that the experts you are claiming.

No one is claiming here it is fact!

Your clearly have no clue who sits at the top of the field here!

Do you even understand the reference ranges for TT let alone the most critical fraction FT?

I will give you a hint...2.5th-97.5th percentile!

Better yet what would it matter if the upper end for TT was 1500 ng/dL or FT was 40 ng/dL?

It would be those F**KING OUTLIERS and a SHORT-LIVED DAILY PEAK to boot LMFAO!




post #31/33




 
Dr Rand just put out a new video on FB with ideal trough levels. He claims that we have known since the 50s that test levels using exogenous testosterone are not the same as those with endogenous production. He said the IDEAL tough level on a once weekly injection is total T 800ng/dl and free T of 29-32. These are the minimum levels to be maintained. He also said, he isn't going to argue with you if you feel great at 16 free T.

When I began TRT these were the numbers and now the lab tests have 20 being too high for free t. I have always shot for free t of 30 and have felt best there. Something to think about.
I agree. All the studies on TRT have been very limited and small. I'll feel the best when my levels above high, both total and free. Also it keeps my libido very strong.
 
I agree. All the studies on TRT have been very limited and small. I'll feel the best when my levels above high, both total and free. Also it keeps my libido very strong.

RERUNS HERE!

First off you are injecting daily no?

Again big difference between one hitting a high trough FT 30-30+ ng/dL injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly LOL!

Stop and think of where the peak sits especially when injecting once weekly we are talking double here!

TT and more importantly FT will be sky-high at peak (within 24 hrs) post-injection and during the first few days to follow.

Overmedicated on T week in and week out!

Again if someone wants to aim for a high-end/high trough FT the easy and most sensible fix here would be injecting daily or EOD not once weekly plain and simple.

Like I said in some of your previous threads where you keep boasting about needing these high T levels to feel your best especially regarding the very strong libido GET OFF the hCG and get back to me on that one LOL!

Libido let alone erectile function is multifactorial and having healthy T levels is only one piece of the puzzle.

It's a myth that one needs high let alone absurdly high FT or DHT for healthy libido/erectile function.

I would put more weight behind use of hCG for libido then I ever would for so called needing to run a high/very high trough FT!

Numerous men running high levels 24/7 steady-state/trough run into libido issues sooner or later especially the men that have been gassed up on FT with a suppressed HPG-axis long-term.

The body was never meant to be amped up on T 24/7 steady-state plain and simple!

Numerous men need to use hCG with T otherwise they continue to struggle.

Ask Nelson why he uses hCG...nah you already know the answer!








 
First off you are injecting daily no?

Again big difference between one hitting a high trough FT 30-30+ ng/dL injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly LOL!

Stop and think of where the peak sits especially when injecting once weekly we are talking double here!

TT and more importantly FT will be sky-high at peak (within 24 hrs) post-injection and during the first few days to follow.

Overmedicated on T week in and week out!

Again if someone wants to aim for a high-end/high trough FT the easy and most sensible fix here would be injecting daily or EOD not once weekly plain and simple.

Like I said in some of your previous threads where you keep boasting about needing these high T levels to feel your best especially regarding the very strong libido GET OFF the hCG and get back to me on that one LOL!

Libido let alone erectile function is multifactorial and having healthy T levels is only one piece of the puzzle.

It's a myth that one needs high let alone absurdly high FT or DHT for healthy libido/erectile function.

I would put more weight behind use of hCG for libido then I ever would for so called needing to run a high/very high trough FT!

Numerous men running high levels 24/7 steady-state/trough run into libido issues sooner or later especially the men that have been gassed up on FT with a suppressed HPG-axis long-term.

The body was never meant to be amped up on T 24/7 steady-state plain and simple!

Numerous men need to use hCG with T otherwise they continue to struggle.

Ask Nelson why he uses hCG...nah you already know the answer!








I guess I broke the mold.
 

ExcelMale Newsletter Signup

Online statistics

Members online
6
Guests online
614
Total visitors
620

Latest posts

Beyond Testosterone Podcast

Back
Top